Zhang, N; Wang, J; Al-Hussein, M and Yin, X (2023) BIM-based automated design of drainage systems for panelized residential buildings. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(15), pp. 2683-2698. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The development of building information modelling has facilitated the improvement of cost and time management in panelized construction. This research proposes an automated method to design and draft drainage systems in the BIM environment. The proposed method can improve design efficiency, eliminate design errors, and reduce material waste. In order to improve production efficiency at the panelized construction plant, the drainage pipe network is separated into smaller components at the geometric boundaries of the plumbing panel which is a floor or wall panel through which pipes pass. Meanwhile, a bill of materials for each plumbing panel is generated for the purpose of further cutting optimization. A prototyped BIM extension application, an add-on to Autodesk Revit, is developed as a proof of concept. A case study of residential drainage system design and optimization is presented to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed framework. As the key contribution of this research, the integration of the BIM model with the automated design system, rule-based pipe route planning approach, and optimal cutting stock algorithm achieves the automation in drainage system design in the context of panelized construction to improve design and production efficiency.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automated design; building information modelling; panelized construction; residential drainage system |
| Index terms: | drainage, time management, construction plant, plumbing, efficiency, design error, integration, automation, building information modelling, case study, residential building, boundaries |
| Subjects: | mechanical systems, organizational analysis, construction equipment, performance management, automation and robotics, professional practice, information systems, data collection methods, project controls, property law, infrastructure and transport systems, construction type |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Time Control, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Plant and Equipment |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here