An association rule mining model for the application of construction technologies during COVID-19

AbdulLateef, O; Sanmargaraja, S; Oni, O; Anavhe, P and Mewomo, C M (2024) An association rule mining model for the application of construction technologies during COVID-19. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(4), pp. 443-453. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

COVID −19 impedes construction productivity, increases costs and delays the project schedule, disrupts health and safety regulations, and reduces profit margins. To flatten the COVID −19 curve and continue operations amid the pandemic, construction companies are digitising construction activities, processes and procedures using technology. This article reports on a study examining the use of construction technologies by Nigerian surveyors through a questionnaire. The questionnaires were sent to more than 300 surveying firms based on snowballing technique. Association rule mining (ARM) was used to model the correlations between the different construction technologies. A total of 91 association rules were identified using 6 measurement matrices. The first 30 rules are presented in this study. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on the sustainability and post-pandemic redesign of surveying practise in terms of repositioning service delivery. The findings are of interest to solution and technology providers to meet market demand. From an ontological perspective, the key findings of this study can be applied to surveying practise in and outside Nigeria and to other professionals in the construction sector. The implication is that construction technologies in the Nigerian construction sector are still in their infancy.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: digital twins; Nigeria; post pandemic; productivity; quantity surveying organisations
Index terms: Nigeria, productivity, construction activity, service delivery, pandemic, redesign, construction technology, construction productivity, mining, construction company, profit, health and safety, surveying, COVID-19, body of knowledge, digital twin, construction sector, regulation, questionnaire
Subjects: knowledge management, construction operations, health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, operations management, design methods, data collection methods, organization, digital engineering, industry analysis, political science, geotechnical engineering, service delivery, Geography, health safety and environment, health risk and incident analysis, management
Topics: Site Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Governance, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here