Critical audit indicators for assessing construction projects performance (CPP) at pre-contract stage in Tanzania

Aloyce, D; Monko, R J and Luvara, V G M (2024) Critical audit indicators for assessing construction projects performance (CPP) at pre-contract stage in Tanzania. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(5), pp. 530-539. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This study evaluates the current practices of auditing for CPP in Tanzania and identifies critical performance audit indicators at the PCS. A sequential exploratory mixed methods approach comprising of documentary review from four (4) main audit institutions in Tanzania, 9-semi-structured interviews, and 43 questionnaires from audit experts were employed. Qualitative content analysis, and descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse qualitative and quantitative data respectively. From the findings, practitioners variably audit the performance of projects, either by omitting some measures at specific stages, measuring certain items in isolation, or overlapping some measures across stages of a project, which influences the different interpretations of the audit results. Study findings further indicate that procurement plans, budget, and feasibility study are the top most significant indicators at a planning stage, while client requirements, contract documents, and specifications are the top significant indicators at the design stage. Appropriateness of the method of procurement, evaluation process, award of contract, and capacity and competence of the selected contractor regarding project size, and complexity, are considered the most significant at the procurement stage. This study provides useful insights into performance audit indicators for construction project auditors and a baseline for audit practice policy directions in developing countries.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: audit; critical audit indicators; performance; pre-contract; Tanzania
Index terms: competence, complexity, client requirements, mixed method, audit, design stage, interview, contract document, practitioner, construction project, content analysis, developing country, questionnaire, feasibility study, Tanzania, specification, statistics
Subjects: performance measurement, mathematical modelling, personnel development, data collection methods, professional development, development economics, contractual condition, design stages, professional practice, data analysis and analytics, systems engineering, production management, Geography, practitioner
Topics: Research Practice, Quality Management, Project Management, Design Practice, International Construction, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Geographical Context, Human Resources, Contract Administration, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here