Quantifying labour impact cost due to change orders

Alzraiee, H (2024) Quantifying labour impact cost due to change orders. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(4), pp. 467-475. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Change orders are an integral part of most construction projects. Their impact on labour productivity is well established in literature and practice. However, quantifying change order impact on labour productivity continues to be a challenging issue and a source of dispute between Employers and Contractors. The currently used methods in quantifying the change order impact on labour productivity are based on statistical models, historical data, or unimpacted labour productivity period. Therefore, there is a need to expand these methods to include a standardized method to quantify the change order impact. This article presents a new method to quantify the labour productivity loss due to change order impact on the project base scope. The proposed method deploys many project management techniques such as scheduling, change order analysis, earned value, progress tracking and cost estimation to accurately estimate the loss of labour productivity due to change orders. The method was implemented during the construction phase of an electrical project to confirm its applicability and usefulness to the construction industry. The project parties were able to prove that the change orders had impacted labour productivity and accurately quantified their impact.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: change orders; impact cost; labour productivity; productivity loss
Index terms: statistical model, construction phase, estimate, construction industry, progress tracking, labour productivity, dispute, project management technique, productivity, change order, construction project, project party, cost estimating, scheduling
Subjects: sociology, project controls, industry analysis, management, contractual condition, production management, operations research, operations management, financial and cost management, project delivery, data science, dispute resolution
Topics: Contract Administration, Time Control, Site Management, Legal Issues, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here