Awe, O O; Atofarati, E O; Adeyinka, M O; Musa, A P and Onasanya, E O (2024) Assessing the factors affecting building construction collapse casualty using machine learning techniques: A case of Lagos, Nigeria. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(3), pp. 261-269. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Building construction collapse in Nigeria has become a subject of international concern in recent times due to numerous lives and properties being wasted yearly. This study presents a brief statistical report of building collapse in Nigeria from 2000–2021, using Lagos State as a case study and conducts a comparative analysis using five supervised machine learning algorithms, namely Robust Linear Model (RLM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K Nearest Neigbours (KNN), Random Forest (RF) and Decision Tree (DT) for predicting the rate of casualty from building collapse in Lagos Nigeria. Feature importance was performed to determine the most relevant factors that causes building construction collapse casualty. The result shows that the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm has the best forecasting performance among the other algorithms considered. Feature importance analysis, using the SVM model ranked the factors affecting building construction collapse in order of relevance and 'location' is considered the most relevant factor contributing to building collapse casualty in Nigeria. Results from this study are important for policy makers and the study recommends that proper onsite geo-technical inspection should be done on site locations before commencement of building constructions in Nigeria.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building collapse; feature importance; Lagos; machine learning; site location |
| Index terms: | forest, comparative analysis, building construction, machine learning, case study, forecasting, onsite, inspection, Nigeria, decision tree, Lagos, Lagos State |
| Subjects: | building construction, decision analysis, quality assurance, Geography, prediction and forecasting, artificial intelligence, data analysis and analytics, environmental science, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Quality Management, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Research Practice, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here