Conceptual cost estimation of highway bid unit prices using ordinary kriging

Awuku, B; Asa, E and Baffoe-Twum, E (2024) Conceptual cost estimation of highway bid unit prices using ordinary kriging. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(3), pp. 351-360. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

State-of-the-art encompasses the application of deterministic and geostatistical algorithms to quantify the effect of spatial variation of unit prices across different locations. No studies have evaluated the efficacy of the different combinations of variogram and kriging models when used to characterize the spatial variability of major highway bid unit prices, as well as how well they predict future unit prices at unsampled locations. In this paper, ordinary kriging was combined with three commonly used semivariograms (spherical, exponential, Gaussian) models one at a time to predict six years of the top five common highway bid items obtained from the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) and evaluated the prediction uncertainty for each bid item. The results show that the best-performing combination of ordinary kriging and semivariogram varied depending on the type of bid unit-price data. This study advances the state of practice by comparing the efficacy of various combinations of the variogram and ordinary kriging models in predicting highway bid unit prices and provides insight into the models' behavior in describing bid unit price spatial heterogeneity. Transportation agencies can employ this methodology to model other highway bid items and project types that have not been experimented in this study.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bid items; conceptual; cost estimation; geostatistical interpolation; highway
Index terms: state of the art, methodology, variation, cost estimating, variability, transportation agency
Subjects: statistical analysis, transportation engineering, research methods, contractual condition, financial and cost management, research dissemination and communication
Topics: Contract Administration, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here