De Marco, A; Narbaev, T; Ottaviani, F M and Vanhoucke, M (2024) Influence of cost contingency management on project estimates at completion. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(9), pp. 935-945. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The Earned Value Management (EVM) methodology provides an index-based Estimate at Completion (EAC) formula to forecast the final cost of an ongoing project. However, neither the EVM methodology nor the literature in cost forecasting considers the occurrence of risks and how the cost contingency reserve (CC) is used to mitigate them. This study proposes a risk-adjusted cost EAC methodology based on nonlinear regression that captures the CC spending profile and exploits it to improve the EAC forecasting performance. The CC spending profile reflects the preventive, neutral, or reactive risk management strategy (RMS) adopted, which dictates how the CC reserve is depleted throughout the project execution. The framework was tested on a dataset comprising 79 constructions and engineering projects to evaluate its performance across the projects' early, mid, and late stages. Results show that the proposed methodology provides timely forecasts—mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) improves as the project progresses—and that a proactive RMS is the most reliable one in all stages, with MAPE values of 14.57%, 12.28%, and 11.42%, respectively.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost contingency; earned value management; estimates; project monitoring; risk behaviour |
| Index terms: | estimate, risk management, cost forecasting, forecasting, project monitoring, contingency reserve, dataset, methodology, risk behaviour, earned value management, strategy |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, control systems, prediction and forecasting, financial and cost management, economics, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, management, financial risk, data management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Risk Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here