Managing external stakeholders influences in mega construction projects

Diyagama, D; Victar, H C; Waidyasekara, A S and Rameezdeen, R (2024) Managing external stakeholders influences in mega construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(8), pp. 809-819. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Mega construction projects have been a vital source of interest among different external stakeholders due to its complex nature. Although, the internal stakeholders are more concerned about a project, external stakeholders have a higher potential to influence mega construction projects by employing different strategies during the project life cycle. This has become a key issue for project owner since it leads to project suspension, delays, and cost overruns, which eventually leads to technical and internal project-related concerns. To achieve the research goal, a multiple case design was used, with two rounds of data-gathering methods comprising a desktop study and semi-structured interviews. Thirteen external stakeholder groups were identified. The outcomes of this research demonstrated that a diverse variety of external stakeholders arose among local governments, national governments, social and professional organisations, and political organisations are all common stakeholders in mega construction projects. Some stakeholders are particular to a project. Moreover, it is a significant fact that the project owner has the potential to successfully mitigate external influences without making many changes to the project scope. Thus, this article discussed external stakeholders' impacts on mega construction projects throughout the project life cycle, as well as mitigation steps taken by project owners.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: external stakeholder influences; external stakeholders; mega construction; mitigation strategies; project life cycle; project owner perspective
Index terms: mitigation, strategy, interview, local government, project scope, external stakeholder, owner, life cycle, cost overrun, construction project
Subjects: data collection methods, sociology, administrative law, scope management, value management, production management, financial and cost management, management, financial risk
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Cost Management, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here