A chance-constrained programming method with credibility measure for solving the multi-skill multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem

Ghasemi, M; Chakrabortty, R K; Shahabi-Shahmiri, R and Mirnezami, S A (2024) A chance-constrained programming method with credibility measure for solving the multi-skill multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(10), pp. 1090-1106. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This paper addresses a multi-skilled extension of the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem (MRCPSP) with preemption of activities and generalized precedence relations under uncertainty. The problem is formulated mathematically as a single objective optimization model to minimize the project makespan. Concerning real-world circumstances, amount of non-renewable resources and availability are considered as interval type-2 fuzzy numbers. Therefore, a type-2 fuzzy chance-constrained programming (TFCP) method is developed to tackle the problem. Four unique characteristics are taken into account in this paper concurrently: (i) multi-skilled resources; (ii) renewable and non-renewable resources; (iii) preemptable activities; and (iv) interval type-2 fuzzy parameters. The existence of these practical contributions causes projects schedule, especially construction projects, to be closer to the real-world conditions. The proposed mathematical model is validated and tested on instances from PSPLIB (j12, j16 and j18) and MMLIB (MM50 and MM100) datasets. In this study, the computational results for the first time demonstrate that the number of preemption points depend heavily on fluctuations of non-renewable resources and number of skills. It is also shown that considering multi-skill renewable resources is an effective factor in project makespan. In J20, there were both a four-unit reduction and increase in the number of preemption points achieving by increasing the average amount of available non-renewable resources by 23 units and decreasing it by 22 units, respectively. Additionally, when seven skills of renewable resources were reduced, the number of preemption points increased by seven units. In this problem instance, project is completed within 28 days considering multi-skill renewable resources, whereas the project makespan is reported 33 days without considering them. Various sensitivity analyses are presented to evaluate the proposed mathematical model and the overall solution approach. Comparative analysis is conducted to compare the schedule in crisp and uncertain conditions. Eventually, the importance of considering multi-skill resources in project scheduling is illustrated compared to not considering them.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: activity preemption; chance constrained programming; interval type-2 fuzzy parameters; multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem; multi-skill
Index terms: comparative analysis, renewable resources, sensitivity analysis, project scheduling, mathematical model, dataset, programming, construction project
Subjects: mathematical modelling, programming, environmental resource management, data analysis and analytics, production management, project controls, data management, environmental hazards
Topics: Digital Applications, Time Control, Project Management, Research Practice, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here