Allan, C; Sommerville, J; Kennedy, P and Robertson, H (2000) A business unit approach to construction process re-engineering. In: Akintoye, A (ed.) Proceedings of 16th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2000, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
In business change is not an optional extra it comes as standard. Every business regardless of sector, must look to the future and grasp the opportunities that are found there (Hammer, 1999). In the knowledge driven economy, firms that rely on outdated processes will be left behind. Successful companies will innovate, invest heavily in skills of their people and seek new ways of carrying out work activities. They will create a future that establishes a culture which thrives on change and innovation. Business Process Re-engineering allows an organisation to model its business activities through the development of a process map, and adapt a strategy of examining every area with the view to improving process and environmental performance, quality and teamwork. In recent years there has been a remarkable growth of interest in environmental issues - sustainability and the better management of development in harmony with the environment (Glasson et al, 1994). As part of a Teaching Company Programme environmental performance improvements were sought through construction process re-engineering of a core business unit (Central Scotland). Re-engineering these processes brings about quality, environmental and business value enhancement. The findings from case reviews within Morrison Construction Limited highlight the development of the underlying paradigms and mechanisms through which to engage in more sustainable development.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | environmental management system; development; re-engineering; sustainable; process mapping |
| Index terms: | teamwork, core busines, environmental management system, environmental performance, business process re-engineering, environmental issue, programme, strategy, sustainable development, Scotland, construction process, paradigm, mapping |
| Subjects: | business, environmental issues, control systems, project controls, building construction, management, sustainability assessment, education and knowledge transfer, spatial and geospatial analysis, Geography, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Time Control, Site Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here