Optimizing contractor's accruals under conditions of penalty imposition due to unforeseen delays

Jain, R and Prakash, O (2024) Optimizing contractor's accruals under conditions of penalty imposition due to unforeseen delays. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(8), pp. 854-866. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This study aims to provide an optimal activity crashing-scheduling plan to maximize profit for the contractor under conditions of imposed penalty due to unforeseen delays. A large number of construction projects suffer from time overruns. A financial penalty is imposed when the delay is attributable to the contractor. Contractors often crash activities to complete projects on time to avoid penalties. However, the crashing of activities inflates the project cost, which the contractor bears. This leads to dwindling profit margins and losing economic justification for the contractor to complete the project. The contractor is often puzzled about how much delay to compensate by crashing, so there is still some profit to be made. To address this issue, the time-cost trade-off is restructured to maximize profit for the contractor in a constrained optimization formulation. The developed methodology integrates linear programming with the critical path method. Performance evaluation results show superior profit realization for contractors compared to traditional methods that crash activities on a predefined critical path. The method can find optimal crashing scheduling of activities to compensate for delays such that the cost overrun is minimized, and the profit earned by the contractor is maximized.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: activity crashing-scheduling; construction project management; cost overrun; critical path method; linear programming; penalty imposition; profit optimization; uncertainty delays
Index terms: critical path, crashing, profit, project cost, scheduling, penalty, performance evaluation, critical path method, construction project, methodology, cost overrun, linear programming, time overrun, time-cost trade-off, construction project management
Subjects: financial and cost management, economic analysis, operations research, production management, project management theory and practice, performance measurement, quantity surveying, research methods, algorithms, economics, regulatory law, project controls
Topics: Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Time Control, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here