Koo, H J; O’Connor, J and Sprouse, R (2024) Analyzing the characteristics of design defect leading indicators on building construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(8), pp. 834-842. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The construction industry is experiencing increased complexity and rapid technology development, with a large number of multi-organizations involved; such features impede effective design management and satisfactory design quality on building construction projects. The consequences of poor design are severe, including project cost overrun, schedule delay, and field rework, and these directly impact overall construction project performance. Therefore, it is imperative to pay attention to design quality management in construction projects. To provide actionable knowledge for better design quality management, this study aims to identify and analyze key design tasks during the design phase to prevent severe defects. This study utilizes the defect-leading indicator questions incorporated in the design quality management tool developed in a previous study. By qualitatively analyzing these leading indicator questions, four main design task categories to achieve design quality were identified along with their distinctive characteristics. Moreover, by conducting a statistical analysis, these four categories were compared in various ways. From the results, this study revealed that the design tasks in four categories should be addressed during similar timing (i.e. end of design development to midway through construction documents). However, the severity of their impacts from design defects associated with each category is different. This study contributes to the body of knowledge in the design management domain by demonstrating fundamental design tasks for defect prevention. In addition, the results of this study allow industry practitioners to make appropriate design decisions and to ensure necessary design activities by considering their associated defects impacts and timing of applications.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design quality; design defect characteristics; design defect leading indicators; design quality management |
| Index terms: | design defect, statistical analysis, schedule delay, building design, construction industry, prevention, design development, design phase, building construction, rework, overrun, project cost, design quality, body of knowledge, technology development, design decision, complexity, design management, construction project, practitioner, documents |
| Subjects: | practitioner, operations management, professional practice, data science, innovation and technology management, knowledge management, architectural design, design practice, economics, production management, professional development, design process, financial risk, project controls, building construction, industry analysis, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Time Control, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Cost Management, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here