Kumar, A; Meena, R K; Sharma, D and Raj, R (2024) Structural parameters of wrench–c shape building using CFD. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(6), pp. 664-672. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Wind flow pattern and generation of strong and large eddies is mainly responsible to the wind pressure and suction intensity in and around the tall building. If the shape of the structure is not vary common then the wind generated effects need to evaluate for the high rise structure this is because of the reason that the data for the regular plan cross sectional shape is available in the various international standards. This study investigating the wind effects on irregular cross sectional shape tall building using CFD tool ANSYS CFX. The current study evaluates the wind impacts for a boundary layer atmospheric wind flow from 0° to 180° at a 15° interval. The power law described in IS: 875 (Part 3): 2015 for terrain category II follows the wind profile. For a rectangular model, the values of the pressure coefficients are compared using the numerical simulation and the information supplied in IS 875. Results are given at numerous locations, including pressure coefficients around the building model’s periphery and force and moment coefficients for wind incidence angles ranging from 0° to 180° at 15° intervals.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | C shape model; computational fluid dynamics; force and moment coefficients; irregular model; pressure around the building; tall building |
| Index terms: | tall building, high rise, numerical simulation, wind pressure, wind effect, computational fluid dynamics |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, environmental science, construction type, structural engineering |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here