Lambers, R; Cheung, F and Skitmore, M (2024) Risk management strategies for common residential construction defects: The case of Queensland, Australia. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(10), pp. 1126-1135. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
This study investigates the defect management strategies of small and medium residential building enterprises (SMEs) in Queensland, Australia, towards developing a model for the risk management of most recurring defects. A defects causation topology retrieved from the literature is combined with the results of a questionnaire survey of 427 residential construction trade respondents and validated by a focus group of experienced building practitioners. The results show 42 taxonomies grouped into three main categories: management strategies to organizational influences, defective supervision, and preconditions for defective acts. Communication and information sharing about defects are essential, as the industry relies on individual experience to solve defects-related problems. The most recurring defects for the Builder trade are Concrete driveways and paths, guttering and eaves construction defects, and Stormwater drainage pipework installation and workmanship defects. The most popular management strategies for the Carpentry trade are cupboard installation and workmanship defects, stairs and balustrade defects, and timber doors and windows defects. The findings suggest that residential construction trades face repetitive difficulties in implementing on-site defect management strategies, with SMEs resistant to new trends and continuing to use conventional practice methods based on 'known ways of doing things' rather than innovation and updated defect management strategies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | causation topology; management strategies; questionnaire survey; residential construction defects |
| Index terms: | building practitioner, supervision, management strategy, Australia, survey, stormwater, residential building, taxonomies, residential construction, window, builder, defect management, focus group, Queensland, face, risk management, information sharing, drainage, workmanship, strategy, topology, questionnaire, construction defect |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, geometry and topology, data collection methods, quality assurance, control systems, practitioner, management, contract obligations, risk assessment, construction integration, psychology, construction type, architectural elements, knowledge organization and systems, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental engineering, data exchange, Geography |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Contract Administration, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Project Management, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Information Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Design Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here