Cost estimation models for seismic retrofit of masonry school buildings

Mirzaei, J; Amiri Hanzaei, H; Khaleghi, H and Kashani, H (2024) Cost estimation models for seismic retrofit of masonry school buildings. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(8), pp. 843-853. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Seismic retrofits can significantly reduce the vulnerability of masonry buildings. Multiple seismic retrofit alternatives are often available for a given building. Estimating the cost of each candidate action is essential to selecting and implementing the appropriate seismic retrofit initiatives. This research harnesses the capabilities of various regression models for cost estimation. A dataset from 167 retrofit projects for masonry school buildings was used to develop models. Three main retrofit actions were taken into consideration: shotcrete, steel belt and fiber-reinforced polymer. Various regression methods, including multiple linear regression, ridge regression, lasso regression, and elastic net regression, were applied to develop models that estimate the cost of each of the three retrofit actions based on a set of explanatory variables. Next, the models underwent a reduction process to simplify and increase their prediction precision. In most models, the reduction process eliminated multiple terms and enhanced the model prediction performance. This article identifies the height of the building as the most influential parameter governing retrofit costs. It examines the effect of proxy variables (e.g. lateral area of walls and added lateral strength) on the final retrofit cost by adding them as explanatory variables.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost estimation; lasso regression; project management; regression; ridge regression; seismic retrofit
Index terms: estimate, project management, regression model, dataset, estimating, school building, vulnerability, cost estimating
Subjects: construction type, financial and cost management, project management theory and practice, statistical analysis, environmental hazards, data management
Topics: Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here