Sanyal, A P and Bhattacharya, S P (2024) A comparative analysis between CBR based prediction models and mra models for high-rise construction delay prediction. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(2), pp. 124-136. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
A large number of construction projects being executed across the world are beset with schedule overruns. Although multiple regression analysis (MRA) has been widely considered as a prediction model, techniques like case-based reasoning (CBR) can also be explored for delay prediction. Although CBR has been previously considered for anticipating the construction costs by many researchers, studies pertaining to determining the construction schedule and the subsequent overrun are rare. The research paper develops a prediction model for determining the construction schedule delay using CBR and compares the observations against those obtained using MRA. Primary construction data was collected for real estate projects being executed and nearing completion in Kolkata, India. Using the observations from the primary data, attribute weights were determined using MRA and ANN. Prediction analysis was performed using MRA and using CBR with the attribute weights input from MRA and ANN. CBR-based models show a certain advantage over conventional MRA prediction models as the overall prediction accuracy obtained using CBR analysis showed a higher prediction accuracy as compared to MRA. Extensive usages of techniques like CBR can prove to be beneficial for construction project stakeholders as an excellent tool for systematically utilizing past experiences in future projects predictions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural network; case-based reasoning; delay prediction; high-rise construction; multiple regression analysis; prediction models |
| Index terms: | schedule delay, schedule overrun, construction cost, real estate, India, case-based reasoning, research paper, high-rise construction, artificial neural network, prediction model, accuracy, overrun, comparative analysis, construction project, multiple regression analysis |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, prediction and forecasting, financial and cost management, modelling and simulation, real estate economics, research dissemination and communication, statistical analysis, project controls, cognitive psychology, building construction, Geography, production management, professional development |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Information Management, Time Control, Design Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here