Singh, J and Anumba, C J (2024) Building commissioning process and documentation: A literature review and directions for future research. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(1), pp. 75-85. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The motivation of this paper is to examine and review the current study, gaps and trends in commissioning process and documentation in the architectural, engineering, construction, operation, and facility management (AECO-FM) industry and to propose future directions for imminent research area to revolutionized commissioning documentation in AECO-FM industry. In this paper, 66 research papers are studied to narrate the evolution of the commissioning process and documentation. This study discussed the current approach and studied adopted by the various retrieved research papers. Followed by identification of research gaps associated with on-going commissioning process and documentation. It has been found that limited studies focus on effective and automated building information sharing during commissioning and closeout stage for efficient building handover and O&M through its lifecycle. The automated digital practices to perform commissioning and handover process are still largely unknown. This study proposes novel approach for building information sharing through digital commissioning process. A scenario is presented to illustrate the application of digital commissioning process for building information sharing and verification of building assets. The proposed approach shows automatic and real-time information sharing with a holistic approach to perform building commissioning.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building commissioning; digital process; documentation; real-time information; review |
| Index terms: | real-time information, lifecycle, holistic approach, information sharing, evolution, commissioning, literature review, motivation, documentation, research paper |
| Subjects: | professional development, data exchange, completion, data management, business, research dissemination and communication, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, environmental science, psychology |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here