Son, P V H and Khoi, L N Q (2024) Application of slime mold algorithm to optimize time, cost and quality in construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(13), pp. 1375-1386. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Numerous optimization techniques have been proposed for use in order to address issues with various building project components. It has become easier to solve difficult optimization issues in practice due to the development of numerous innovative algorithms in recent years. The utilization of the Slime Mold Algorithm model to optimize time, cost, and quality trade-off problems (TCQT) in this article. The effectiveness of the SMA model was analyzed, evaluated, and compared with the outcomes produced by the opposition-based multi-objective differential evolution (OMODE), nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO), and multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MODE). The aforementioned results demonstrated the model’s potential as a strategy by substituting the three - factor approach and processing-time optimal. The management of project time, cost and quality is decisive for investment management activities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial intelligence; optimization; slime mold algorithm |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, genetic algorithm, construction project, evolution, optimization technique, strategy, artificial intelligence |
| Subjects: | management, production management, performance management, artificial intelligence, algorithms, environmental science |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Sustainability, Project Management, Digital Applications, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here