Identification of business-project management processes that improve capital efficiency of downstream and chemical projects

Yin, Z; Caldas, C and de Oliveira, D (2024) Identification of business-project management processes that improve capital efficiency of downstream and chemical projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(1), pp. 1-9. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

An important performance measure to evaluate capital expenditure and return on investment (ROI) is capital efficiency. In the downstream and chemicals sector, capital efficiency becomes even more critical. Indeed, this sector is asset-intensive and capital projects carried out there can be large, complex and require significant investment of capital and time. Project capital efficiency can be impacted by how well the business unit aligns with the project unit, as they collaborate in the early project phases to determine how the project will be built and operated. This research aimed to identify business-project management processes that help improve project capital efficiency. The study assembled a 17-expert panel to define project capital efficiency with its four key improvement areas. The panel identified 28 management processes that lead to improvement in project capital efficiency if they are implemented effectively by business and project units in early project phases. A survey was used to determine the relative importance of these management processes. Researchers quantitatively analysed, ranked and compared the relative importance. Findings indicate that 23 management processes are very important to project capital efficiency and four of them are perceived differently in their relative importance by the two units.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: business-project management process; capital efficiency; capital project; downstream and chemicals
Index terms: capital project, efficiency, capital expenditure, survey, return on investment, performance measure, project management process, relative importance
Subjects: performance management, data collection methods, risk assessment, strategic project management, performance measurement, project management theory and practice, economic analysis
Topics: Risk Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here