Zhu, L; Zhu, Q and Zhao, X (2024) Identifying determinants of student learning effects in intensive online environments: An empirical investigation in civil engineering education. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(11), pp. 1249-1258. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic forced a dramatic change from face-to-face learning environments to intensive learning environments. This study aimed to identify and quantify the determinants of student learning effects and their conduction mechanism in intensive online environments. Using a structural equation model and a questionnaire survey, this study proposed and validated the relationships among six constructs including student engagement, perceived learning, satisfaction, instructor behaviours, student characteristics, and the state of health, well-being, and sense of community-related (HWC) issues. 306 valid responses from civil engineering students in 19 universities in China were used to validate the proposed relationships. The measurement and structural model evaluation indicated that the model fit of the fitted model is acceptable with x2/df = 2.548, RMSEA = 0.071, AGFI =0.78, and CFI = 0.93. The results first showed the key factors for student learning effects from the instructor, the student, and the HWC issues with a factor loading greater than 0.8. This study further inferred from the different path coefficients in the fitted model and the mediating model that instructor behaviours greatly influence student perceived learning and satisfaction through student engagement with a contribution of 100% and 58%, respectively; student characteristics have a decisive impact on student perceived learning with a path coefficient of 0.59; HWC issues negatively impact student satisfaction with a path coefficient of −0.11. The findings enrich online education theories in an intensive online environment by clarifying and quantifying the influencing mechanism of the determinants. The findings also advance education practices for students, instructors, and educational administrators by helping them find out their contribution to learning effectiveness and the key factors to improve future online teaching levels.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | determinants; intensive online environments; learning effects |
| Index terms: | face, survey, student engagement, instructor, COVID-19, China, student satisfaction, well-being, questionnaire, engineering education, pandemic, satisfaction, loading, determinant, education practice, investigation, structural equation model, effectiveness |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, risk assessment, mental health and wellbeing, practitioner, psychology, construction operations, project delivery, health risk and incident analysis, performance management, Geography, teaching methods, professions and roles, professional education, student development, statistical analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Education, Site Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here