Sociological and behavioural impediments to earthquake hazard mitigation

Egbelakin, T K and Wilkinson, S (2010) Sociological and behavioural impediments to earthquake hazard mitigation. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 1(3), pp. 310-321. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the behavioural and sociological impediments to successful implementation of earthquake hazard mitigation and to recommend possible intervention strategies. Design/methodology/approach: Data were gathered through a case study methodology and interviews adopted as the research strategy. A semi-structured questionnaire was chosen as a data-collection instrument, with 33 interviews conducted for various stakeholders involved in seismic retrofit decision-making process. Findings: The research main findings include the role of risk perception in diminishing earthquake hazard mitigation, difficulties in assessing benefits and values of seismic retrofit implementation and the hazard mitigation approach adopted by governmental organisations. The findings suggested that stakeholders involved in retrofit decision-making should have a good understanding of the risks faced as well as the implications of their decisions. Originality/value: The paper investigates earthquake hazard mitigation of commercial buildings at the stakeholders-level by adopting a multidisciplinary approach that incorporated decision sciences, policy perspectives and socio-behavioural perspectives. The findings highlight the significance of stakeholders approach to foster adequate mitigation of earthquake risks.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: behaviour; decision making; earthquakes; New Zealand; sociology
Index terms: earthquake, implementation, case study, New Zealand, decision-making process, decision science, sociology, decision-making, methodology, commercial building, mitigation, questionnaire, interview, risk perception, strategy, intervention strategy
Subjects: decision-making and optimization, environmental hazards, decision analysis, Geography, social theory, financial risk, management, research methods, contractual arrangements, construction type, data collection methods
Topics: Business Strategy, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Risk Management, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here