Accessing emergency rest centres in the UK: Lessons learnt

Kipling, J; Newton, R and Ormerod, M (2011) Accessing emergency rest centres in the UK: Lessons learnt. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 2(1), pp. 47-58. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine access for disabled people to emergency rest centres (ERCs) provision in the UK. ERCs are premises used for the temporary accommodation of evacuees during an emergency situation. They form an important part of emergency response, by providing a focal point for receiving people and providing food, shelter, information and support. Design/methodology/approach: Three case studies of ERCs that were established in different local authority areas within the Yorkshire and Humber region in the UK, during a flooding event on 25 June 2007, were used to determine the level of accessibility and inclusion of disabled people at these centres. Findings: While uncovering many instances of good practise, the results from the research identified lessons to be learnt, in particular the main barriers to access were: facilities and elements that did not comprise part of the building's normal operation, such as the provision of bedding, medical assistance and effective communication; and facilities that would not normally be expected to be used to the extent, or duration, whilst the ERC was in operation, such as the adequate welfare facilities. The research found that the civil protection legislation within the UK contains limited guidance for those with responsibility for ERC provision, and little impetus for emergency planners to consider the needs of disabled people. Practical implications: The paper has broad implications for local authorities and national government representatives. It identifies a need for those with responsibility for emergency planning and response to strengthen their knowledge of disabled people, and to adopt a more holistic approach to the provision of emergency planning and response. Originality/value: The study of access issues in ERC situations, as far as the authors are aware, has not been studied previously.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; disabled people; emergency measures; social inclusion; United Kingdom
Index terms: case study, accessibility, emergency planning, planner, holistic approach, duration, social inclusion, disabled, legislation, United Kingdom, local authority, flooding, emergency response, methodology
Subjects: profession, data collection methods, business, legal systems, Geography, financial risk, inclusive design, safety engineering, research methods, environmental hazards, project controls, sociology
Topics: Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Ethics, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here