Kit Miyamoto, H; Gilani, A S J and Wada, A (2011) Damage mitigation for school buildings in seismically vulnerable regions. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 2(1), pp. 8-29. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose – School buildings have suffered disproportionate damage during past and recent earthquakes. For example, during the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, many school buildings collapsed, resulting in loss of life. School buildings in many other parts of the world are also susceptible to this type of widespread damage because of inadequate design, detailing, or poor construction quality. The purpose of this paper is to show how these fatal flaws can be mitigated prior to future catastrophe by using good engineering practice to retrofit vulnerable schools. Design/methodology/approach – Conventional and innovative, cost-effective, and reliable tools are available to prevent damage to schools. It is often necessary to examine a group of buildings or all structures in a locality and develop a comprehensive risk management plan for the vulnerable buildings. As an example, a comprehensive evaluation and retrofit project, under the auspices of the World Bank, is currently under way in Istanbul, Turkey, to address vulnerable school and hospital buildings as discussed in the paper. As part of this effort in Turkey, a guideline that relies on state-of-the-art evaluation and retrofit methods has been developed to assist the local engineers. Findings – Implementation of the program based on the uniform standards developed in the retrofit guidelines, has significantly reduced the seismic risk to schools in Istanbul. Practical implications – The proposed evaluation and implementation technique can be utilized by governments worldwide to prevent further damage to key infrastructure and save millions of lives. Originality/value – Innovative retrofits can be used to provide enhanced performance and provide seismic resiliency for cluster of school buildings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building specifications; earthquakes; risk management; schools; Turkey |
| Index terms: | World Bank, engineer, building specification, Turkey, seismic risk, implementation, risk management, earthquake, construction quality, Istanbul, mitigation, state of the art, methodology, program, school building |
| Subjects: | Geography, financial risk, software systems, research methods, quality assurance, environmental hazards, risk assessment, construction type, profession, research dissemination and communication, contractual arrangements, professional practice, institutional frameworks |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Procurement, Sustainability, Governance, Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here