Risk and vulnerability assessment: A comprehensive approach

Nirupama, N (2012) Risk and vulnerability assessment: A comprehensive approach. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 3(2), pp. 103-114. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Disaster risk and vulnerability assessment depends on various factors such as appropriate theoretical concepts and quality and adequacy of information gathered. Accounting for people's perception and partnering with them in the process leads to deeper understanding of community vulnerability, which in turn provides better assessment of disaster risk. The purpose of this paper is to offer an integrated approach for risk and vulnerability assessment that includes theoretical concept, quantitative risk assessment method, and a component representing people's perception. The Pressure and Release (PAR) model framework is used for basic understanding of the progression of vulnerability through identification of root causes such as: limited access to power and resources; dynamic pressures – lack of education, urbanization and demographics; and unsafe conditions such as dangerous locations. To complement PAR, the Access to Resources (ATR) model is used that expands upon the dynamics of changing decisions, options, livelihood opportunities, available resources, and choices made by the population that is impacted by disaster(s) – in time and space. Conventional risk equation: R=H x V provides community risk profile. Using a working example, it is demonstrated that risk assessment can have significant influence by introducing an additional component to represent “community perception” in the fundamental risk equation. The proposed approach: Risk (R) = Hazard (H) x Vulnerability (V) x Community Perception (cp), provides a unique and comprehensive approach to evaluate disaster risk by taking people's perception into account.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: communities; community perception; disaster management; disaster risk; disasters; mitigation; risk assessment; vulnerability
Index terms: integrated approach, disaster risk, accounting, population, vulnerability, mitigation, urbanization, partnering, demographics, disaster management, option, dynamics, risk assessment
Subjects: urban planning, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, financial risk, demography, partnership management, decision analysis, systems engineering, environmental hazards
Topics: Urban Studies, Procurement, Sustainability, Governance, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here