Pathirage, C; Seneviratne, K; Amaratunga, D and Haigh, R (2012) Managing disaster knowledge: Identification of knowledge factors and challenges. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 3(3), pp. 237-252. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: Knowledge management can play a vital role through ensuring the availability and accessibility of accurate and reliable disaster risk information when required and through effective lesson learning. Identification of key disaster knowledge factors will be an enabler to manage disasters successfully. The purpose of this paper is to present key knowledge factors relating to disaster management cycle, and explore a few challenges relating to identified disaster knowledge factors. Design/methodology/approach: A list of disaster knowledge factors was first identified through a comprehensive literature review and later semi-structured interviews were conducted among few disaster management practitioners to explore the influence and challenges relating to identified knowledge factors. Findings: Technological, operational/managerial, economic, social, legal and environmental factors seem to have direct influence over the disaster management cycle, while the influence of institutional and political factors seemed indirect and it is through other factors identified. Among key challenges, the lack of detection and warning systems, the need for effective education, training and awareness raising programmes, the need for regular updating of disaster related laws, lack of funds for economic planning measures, poor planning, poor communication, poor leadership, and poor institutional arrangement were highlighted. Originality/value: Owing to paucity of literature and inadequate empirical research done, this paper provides the basis for more empirical research on disaster knowledge factors and sharing of lessons learned. In order to enhance the management of disasters in future, challenges identified need to be addressed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | challenges; disaster management; disasters; knowledge factors; knowledge management |
| Index terms: | programme, literature review, disaster risk, interview, knowledge management, environmental factor, lessons learned, practitioner, methodology, accessibility, disaster management, political factor |
| Subjects: | project controls, political science, inclusive design, research methods, financial risk, professional development, environmental science, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Governance, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Time Control, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here