Bouraoui, D and Lizarralde, G (2013) Centralized decision making, users' participation and satisfaction in post-disaster reconstruction: The case of Tunisia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 4(2), pp. 145-167. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to report the results of a study of a post-flood reconstruction project conducted in 2003 in the village of Bousalem in Tunisia, a country that is poorly documented in reconstruction literature and that is known for its high levels of centralization in decision making. It examines the relations between project stakeholders, the structure of the team established to conduct the project (the Temporary Multi-Organisation, TMO) and the most important concerns of end-users. It particularly shows the drawbacks of neglecting a participatory approach and favouring instead the centralization of decision making at different levels of the TMO organisational structure. Design/methodology/approach: Users' satisfaction was assessed through technology transfer indicators, based on the qualitative analysis of several interviews with end-users. The analysis of the organizational system was based on a qualitative analysis of the TMOs' formal and informal structuring. Findings: The results confirm the need to decentralize decisions at a level that: optimizes the efficiency of local stakeholders; facilitates the participation of end-users; and allows an appropriate distribution of responsibilities and risks among stakeholders. Originality/value: The results show how certain decisions related to the structure and functioning of the TMO affect the match between the project initiators' capacity to provide an adequate solution and the users' expectations and requirements after the disaster.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision making; developing countries; natural disasters; post disaster reconstruction; project management; stakeholders; Tunisia; vulnerability |
| Index terms: | temporary multi-organization, satisfaction, efficiency, reconstruction, project management, post-disaster reconstruction, organizational structure, participatory approach, interview, developing country, natural disaster, technology transfer, vulnerability, qualitative analysis, project stakeholder, Tunisia, decision-making, methodology |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, development economics, Geography, post-disaster and reconstruction, performance management, research methods, environmental hazards, decision analysis, sociology, building construction, research design and methodology, business, data collection methods, project delivery, knowledge management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Urban Studies, International Construction, Quality Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here