Crawford, L; Langston, C and Bajracharya, B (2013) Participatory project management for improved disaster resilience. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 4(3), pp. 317-333. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: Disaster response and recovery is implemented through multiple projects with traditional project management approaches criticised as too time consuming and inflexible in circumstances of high uncertainty, requiring rapid reaction for multiple stakeholders. This research aims to understand the role of project and stakeholder management in the management of disasters as an opening for identifying improved disaster resilience opportunities using participatory project management approaches. Design/methodology/approach: Using the 2011 Queensland floods as a case study, the positioning of project management in disaster management discourse was investigated through summative content analysis. Findings: Results demonstrate that project and stakeholder engagement are poorly positioned in current disaster management discourse, although risk management appears more central, closely associated with disaster response. Research limitations/implications: This is the first stage of more extensive reviews of the positioning of project management in disaster management policies and practice. Further stages will involve a wider range of texts and textual analysis. Practical implications: Results confirm poor recognition of traditional project management approaches in disaster management discourse indicating potential for more innovative and participatory approaches integrating multiple stakeholder perspectives to support disaster resilience. Social implications: Achieving improved community safety and disaster resilience requires multiple stakeholder collaboration for capability development in effective management of projects required to predict, respond and recover from disastrous events. Originality/value: The paper addresses the sparse overlap between project and disaster management literatures identifying potential for more participatory management of disaster events.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | disaster response; disasters; extreme weather events; participatory approaches; project management; resilience; stakeholders |
| Index terms: | capability development, recovery, case study, disaster response, extreme weather event, disaster management, project management, stakeholder engagement, risk management, content analysis, disaster resilience, Queensland, participatory approach, participatory management, stakeholder management, methodology, collaboration |
| Subjects: | operations management, data analysis and analytics, participation process, risk assessment, data collection methods, climate science, community and social dimensions, emergency and crisis management, research methods, management, financial risk, project management theory and practice, Geography |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here