Lucini, B (2013) Social capital and sociological resilience in megacities context. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 4(1), pp. 58-71. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: During the last few decades social resilience and social vulnerability have been two crucial sociological concepts for everyone involved in crisis and disaster management. The fundamental purpose in the present analysis is based on the consideration of resilience from a sociological perspective and the notion of social capital, its proper features, dynamics and processes within different groups of people involved in a disaster process. Design/methodology/approach: All these social components could be evaluated as social indicators of vulnerability and resilience according to the sociological approach and its main theories about social capital and resilience, social and methodological implications. The operative context of this theoretical reflection has been constituted by megacities, considered as the "new" social space where, nowadays, major social relations and risk reduction actions take place through a collaborative pattern not based on a top down organizational model. Findings: Attention is focused on the sociological findings as the importance of social cohesion, strengthening social relationships with particular consideration for the crucial role of social capital during all stages of the disaster process: prevention and preparedness, planning, warning communication, physical and psychological impacts, emergency and disaster response, recovery and reconstruction with the specific aim of enhancing social resilience and attempting to diminish social vulnerability. Originality/value: The originality of this proposal in the field of disaster resilience is its use of the sociological approach and its theoretical characteristics and instruments, such as, for example, the definitions of social capital. The consideration for this topic will be future challenges to improve urban disaster risk reduction according to social relationship and its characteristics of interconnection and multidimensionality.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | disasters; megacities; resilience; risk management; social capital |
| Index terms: | disaster risk reduction, strengthening, vulnerability, social cohesion, methodology, social capital, disaster resilience, risk reduction, proposal, operative, prevention, disaster management, risk management, dynamics, reflection, disaster response, reconstruction, recovery |
| Subjects: | practitioner, climate science, risk assessment, project planning, operations management, financial risk, professional development, structural engineering, research methods, systems engineering, environmental hazards, sociology, emergency and crisis management, building construction |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here