Heat wave adaptations for UK dwellings and development of a retrofit toolkit

Porritt, S M; Cropper, P C; Shao, L and Goodier, C I (2013) Heat wave adaptations for UK dwellings and development of a retrofit toolkit. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 4(3), pp. 269-286. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Purpose – Dwelling retrofit strategies generally concentrate on measures to reduce energy use and carbon emissions. However, climate change projections predict increases in both the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, including heat waves. It is predicted that by the 2040s severe heat waves similar to the European one in August 2003 may be expected to occur every year. Future guidance therefore needs to combine mitigation with adaptation in order to provide safe and comfortable dwellings, whilst also reducing heating energy use, within the available retrofit budget. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The research presented here used dynamic thermal simulation (EnergyPlus) to model a range of passive interventions on selected dwelling types to predict the effect on both dwelling overheating during a heat wave and annual space heating energy use. The interventions include modifications and additions to solar control, insulation and ventilation. Findings – Results demonstrate the effectiveness of interventions that reduce solar heat gains, with external shutters fitted to windows being the most effective single intervention in many cases. Solar reflective coatings also reduce overheating but lead to increased winter heating energy use, whilst wall insulation reduces heating energy use but can, in some cases, lead to increased overheating. The choice of wall insulation type is shown to be very important, with external insulation consistently performing better than internal for overheating reduction. The modelling further demonstrates that combined interventions can significantly reduce or in many cases eliminate overheating. Overheating exposure was found to vary significantly (up to a factor of ten times) between dwelling types. It can be significantly greater for residents who have to stay at home during the daytime, such as the elderly or infirm, and different interventions are sometimes more suitable in these cases. Originality/value – An innovative modelling methodology integrating overheating reduction, heating energy use and intervention cost has been developed and implemented for adapting UK dwellings to future heat waves. Other innovations include an automated approach for large volumes of simulations (over 180,000); a unique graphical interpretation method for presenting single and combined intervention results; and a user-friendly, interactive retrofit toolkit, which is available online for public access and free of charge.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptation; building simulation; costs; heat wave; housing; intervention; overheating; retrofit; toolkit
Index terms: effectiveness, extreme weather event, energy use, modelling, building simulation, insulation, elderly, carbon emission, solar heat gain, energyplus, adaptation, methodology, window, mitigation, space heating, toolkit, exposure, retrofit strategy, climate change, housing, winter, overheating, ventilation, coating
Subjects: analytical methods, energy systems, environmental science, building materials, modelling and simulation, climate science, air quality, user focus, mechanical systems, construction type, thermal systems, demography, financial risk, public and environmental health, research methods, software systems, performance management, architectural elements, renovation and retrofit
Topics: Sustainability, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here