Post-tsunami resettlement in Sri Lanka and India: Site planning, infrastructure and services

Ahmed, I and McEvoy, D (2014) Post-tsunami resettlement in Sri Lanka and India: Site planning, infrastructure and services. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(1), pp. 53-65. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Purpose: After the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, major resettlement programmes were implemented in the affected countries including Sri Lanka and India. New settlements were built from scratch on vacant land, which consisted of building new houses and provision of infrastructure and services. Some of these programmes in Sri Lanka and India were reviewed in an Australian Research Council (ARC) funded research and this paper presents and analyses some of the findings of the research. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: The research is based on interviews of residents and representatives of agencies involved in planning and implementing the resettlement programmes, and on-site observations. The investigation examined critical aspects of settlement development including site planning, transport, drainage, water supply, sanitation, waste management and security. Findings: Very little site planning guidelines were available specifically for resettlement programmes; in both the case study countries, general planning guidelines were applied. Provision and management of infrastructure and services presents great challenges in developing countries as high capital investment and good technical skills for design, implementation and maintenance are required. Some of the resettlement schemes had the advantage of being centrally located and hence had access to schools, health centres and other facilities. However, others were in isolated locations and beneficiaries faced problems in accessing basic facilities. Drainage was a problem - most schemes did not have any surface drainage plan; low areas had not been elevated, slopes not levelled, and land not compacted before construction. Electricity and water supply had been provided in all the programmes, but conditions and quality varied. In many of the schemes, sanitation presented a problem. However, in Chennai, the sewage system worked well and this was one achievement all interview respondents praised. Solid waste management and security posed additional problems. Originality/value: In the global context of increasing frequency and intensity of disasters due to climate change, adequate planning and implementation of reconstruction and resettlement programmes has become more important than ever. In this regard, the lessons gained in this paper should be of value and can provide guidance to post-disaster resettlement programmes in developing countries.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: India; infrastructure; post-disaster reconstruction; Sri Lanka; tsunami
Index terms: reconstruction, case study, land, India, solid waste management, implementation, sewage, investigation, post-disaster reconstruction, Sri Lanka, tsunami, slope, programme, interview, developing country, water supply, capital investment, technical skill, agency, drainage, sanitation, climate change, methodology, waste management, post-tsunami
Subjects: real estate economics, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, data collection methods, waste management, climate science, project controls, sociology, geotechnical engineering, building construction, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental health, environmental hazards, post-disaster and reconstruction, research methods, Geography, development economics, professional development
Topics: Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Procurement, International Construction, Urban Studies, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here