Amaratunga, C A (2014) Building community disaster resilience through a virtual community of practice (VCOP). International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(1), pp. 66-78. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to discuss a pilot in-progress project to promote community-based research (CBR) as a tool for disaster resilience planning in rural, remote and coastal communities. Using trans-disciplinary approaches, this project demonstrates how emergency and foresight planning in five rural Canadian pilot communities can be enhanced through the co-design of a pilot Web 2.0 "virtual community of practice" (VCOP). Design/methodology/approach: The VCOP initiative was designed with pilot and field site communities to facilitate knowledge generation and exchange and to enhance community resilience. Building a culturally appropriate disaster resilience process is an iterative "process of discovery" and community engagement. Through CBR the project supports practitioners and volunteers to share promising practices and lessons-learned for disaster resilience planning. Findings: The VCOP is being developed in five rural, remote, coastal pilot sites across Canada. Additional field site work is also underway in three urban centres sponsored by a project partner. This paper provides an overview of the initial concept, design and "proof of concept" work currently underway. The pilot project will end in the Fall 2012. Research limitations/implications: Inspired by the work of American adult educator Etienne Wenger, the VCOP entails co-design and co-ownership of a knowledge engagement process; one which enables local "thought leaders" to participate in emergency planning, preparedness, response and recovery. The VCOP provides a communication platform and fosters "foresight" planning and "education for critical awareness". Through the sharing of theory and practice, i.e. praxis, communities are mobilized and empowered to anticipate future risks and threats and plan for resilient recovery. Practical implications: The VCOP foresight planning paradigm challenges the status quo design and delivery of emergency management protocols from traditional "centres of knowledge and power", e.g. governments and universities and fosters "bottom-up" community-driven planning to anticipate risks and threats and help enhance local capacity for resilient disaster recovery. Originality/value: The novel application of a VCOP to disaster emergency planning is in keeping with the spirit and principles of UNISDR's Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015. VCOP has potential to demonstrate disaster resilience "foresight" planning as evidenced in the adoption of promising ideas and practices developed by communities, for communities. As Louis Pasteur once said "Chance favours the prepared mind".
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | capability; capacity; change management; resilience; risk management |
| Index terms: | site work, praxis, emergency planning, project partner, risk management, ownership, building community, paradigm, Canada, community engagement, platform, community resilience, recovery, knowledge generation, virtual community, emergency management, practitioner, methodology, volunteer, disaster recovery, disaster resilience, change management, Hyogo framework, community-based |
| Subjects: | practitioner, community and social dimensions, climate science, risk assessment, knowledge management, site logistics, operations management, Geography, reflexivity, financial risk, digital design, social equity, management, education and knowledge transfer, economics, research methods, communities and social development, environmental hazards, information systems, sociology, emergency and crisis management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Site Management, Digital Applications, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here