Organizational core competencies and their influence on strategic partnering in registered social landlords (rsls)

Egbu, C O and Bernard, P (2000) Organizational core competencies and their influence on strategic partnering in registered social landlords (rsls). In: Akintoye, A (ed.) Proceedings of 16th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2000, Glasgow, UK.

Abstract

The paper presents some findings of a preliminary investigation into the influence of organisational core competencies on strategic partnering in Registered Social Landlords (RSLs). 'Registered Social Landlords' was a term introduced in 1996 by the then Conservative Government to reflect all those that are associated with the provision of social housing in the UK (e.g. Housing Associations, Housing Trust and other providers of social housing) and registered and regulated by the Housing Corporation. The public sector housing expenditure for RSLs (through the Housing Corporation) represented £633m in 1997/98, which is equivalent to 37,000 dwellings. Of the £58bn output of the UK construction industry, about 10% of the GDP, RSLs social housing represents 1.2% of this output. Social housing is therefore a relatively large sector of public procurement in building work with a major opportunity for diffusing innovation. The last 3 years have also seen much emphasis levelled at strategic partnering from many quarters, including the DETR and the Egan Report, as yielding improvements and adding value in the provision of social housing. There is also an increasing acceptance that organisational core competencies are intangible assets that can create market leverage. They refer to the ability of an organisation to have resources that are utilised and integrated in such a way that is rare and difficult to copy. This study adopted a combination of research strategies, which included, inter alia, semi-structured interviews with 11 Directors from different RSLs, analysis of 30 usable postal questionnaires, analysis of company data and statistics and reports relating to the activities of the RSLs in the last 3 years. The paper examines the nature of organisational core competencies within RSLs and the extent to which they influence strategic partnering. The findings of the study reveal that, like many organisations in different industrial settings, many RSLs have a range of core competencies, which provides them with competitive advantage. This supports the works of Prahalad and Hamel (1990), Teece and Pisano (1994) and Woodall and Winstanley (1998) on "core competencies" and the 'dynamic capabilities' of firms. In relation to strategic partnering within RSLs, the 'Delivery of teamwork training' and the "Delivery of procurement advice on housing provision' were perceived to be the two most important core competencies which influence successful strategic partnering. In addition, the building and maintaining of core competencies are important to how an RSL may position itself in the social housing sector for the long term.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: organisational core competencies; social housing; strategic partnering; competitive advantage
Index terms: housing, housing association, housing provision, statistics, construction industry, social housing, questionnaire, investigation, dynamic capability, public sector, strategy, landlord, teamwork, interview, competitive advantage, partnering
Subjects: management, sociology, market analysis, partnership management, housing and residential development, industry analysis, administrative law, mathematical modelling, construction type, data collection methods, institutional client
Topics: Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here