Mackee, J; Askland, H H and Askew, L (2014) Recovering cultural built heritage after natural disasters: A resilience perspective. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(2), pp. 202-212. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to propose an alternative strategy for preparing, recovering and conserving cultural built heritage (CBH) in the context of natural disasters. It presents the idea that disaster preparedness is integral to CBH protection and conservation. Design/methodology/approach – Building upon a review of existing scholarship on CBH, resilience and disaster management, a conceptual model is proposed to assist key stakeholders preparing for the recovery of CBH after natural disasters. It is argued that the protection and recovery of CBH in the wake of natural disasters require a holistic approach and that the theoretical framework of resilience thinking can support such an approach. Findings – The paper discusses how the process of adaptive cycles has a role to play in the development of a holistic understanding of the conservation process. It proposes an adaptive cycle model that is supported by four critical factors: reordering, conserving, shifting and transforming. Originality/value – Through exploration of systems thinking and resilience theory, the research presented in this paper explores a new approach to the conceptualisation of CBH. The paper presents the first stage of a research project that aims to develop strategies that can support the protection and recovery of CBH in the wake of natural disasters. The proposed model represents a holistic approach for reconceptualising CBH and may, as such, have potential implications that extend from the field of post-disaster recovery into the domain of CBH conservation and protection.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built heritage conservation; built heritage protection; cultural built heritage; disaster resilience; natural disasters; post-disaster reconstruction |
| Index terms: | built heritage, recovery, critical factor, holistic approach, post-disaster reconstruction, conservation, disaster management, post-disaster recovery, systems thinking, disaster preparedness, natural disaster, disaster resilience, strategy, exploration, methodology |
| Subjects: | climate science, risk assessment, business, analytical methods, environmental policy, operations management, environmental resource management, financial risk, management, research methods, safety engineering, post-disaster and reconstruction, heritage and conservation, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here