Collaboration to improve evacuation centre operations in Queensland

Somasundaram, T and Davies, B J (2014) Collaboration to improve evacuation centre operations in Queensland. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(3), pp. 305-317. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a case study of two organisations working in evacuation centres which overcame challenges to develop a constructive relationship, resulting in improved outcomes for disaster-affected people. A wide range of services for disaster-affected communities are provided as part of emergency sheltering. Collaboration between agencies providing services is essential, but sometimes challenging.; Design/methodology/approach – A wide range of services for disaster-affected communities are provided as part of emergency sheltering. Collaboration between agencies providing services is essential, but sometimes challenging. The purpose of this paper is to provide a case study of two organisations working in evacuation centres which overcame challenges to develop a constructive relationship, resulting in improved outcomes for disaster-affected people.; Findings – The Preferred Sheltering Practices provides an ongoing anchor for Australian Red Cross and Environmental Health Australia (EHA) (Queensland) Inc.'s relationship and has led to other tangible benefits such as involvement in each other’s events and trainings. The relationship has become embedded in each organisation’s day-to-day business ensuring the relationship’s sustainability beyond individual staff movements.; Originality/value – This case study provides an example of how collaboration can be achieved between two organisations with seemingly different mandates to improve the response for disaster-affected communities.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: collaboration; disaster response; emergency shelter; environmental health evacuation centre; red cross
Index terms: Queensland, movement, mandate, agency, evacuation centre, collaboration, methodology, emergency shelter, environmental health, Australia, anchor, case study, disaster response, Red Cross
Subjects: communities and social development, environmental health, political science, emergency and crisis management, geotechnical engineering, sociology, Geography, management, research methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, data collection methods, construction type
Topics: Organizational Design, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Governance, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here