Syed, A and Routray, J K (2014) Vulnerability assessment of earthquake prone communities in Baluchistan. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(2), pp. 144-162. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess the vulnerability of communities prone to earthquake hazards in Baluchistan at the community and household levels and identify the determinants accounting for the vulnerability of the communities. Baluchistan is vulnerable to potential seismic risk and has recently suffered huge economic and property losses due to the October 2008 earthquake. Design/methodology/approach – The study is based on household surveys, field observations, key informant interviews and focus-group discussions for the assessment of community vulnerability to earthquakes. Findings – The analysis revealed that the community is vulnerable to earthquake hazards both at the community and household levels. The logistic regression model identified three variables, namely, ownership of residential unit, family size and household income, as the most important factors in influencing community vulnerability to earthquake hazards. Practical implications – The paper may help emergency managers, policymakers and local government authorities to implement building codes, urban planning by-laws and projects and activities to empower communities for disaster preparedness and disaster risk reduction. Originality/value – The paper concludes that for earthquake safety, building regulations and spatial planning by-laws should be implemented and monitored rigorously. Community preparedness is essential for enhancing people’s awareness against future earthquake hazards in the area.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | baluchistan; community; disaster risk reduction; earthquake; hazards; vulnerability assessment |
| Index terms: | determinant, ownership, income, household, earthquake, logistic regression, seismic risk, spatial planning, building regulation, disaster risk reduction, urban planning, building code, accounting, vulnerability, methodology, survey, disaster preparedness, interview, manager, local government |
| Subjects: | practitioner, risk assessment, data collection methods, economic analysis, urban planning, financial risk, urban design, economics, safety engineering, research methods, statistical analysis, environmental hazards, regulatory law, administrative law, demography |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Governance, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here