Durham, J and White, R (2015) Collective resilience following mine clearance in Kurdish Iraq. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 6(2), pp. 156-167. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of the study was to identify the economic impacts of landmine clearance on household livelihoods and to present the qualitative findings of a study undertaken in the Kurdish region of Iraq. Design/methodology/approach – The sampling method followed a case series, purposive sampling design. Five recipient households were interviewed from different districts. In addition, purposively selected program staff (N = 4) and local community leaders (N = 2) were interviewed. When undertaking the thematic analysis of the Kurdish household qualitative interviews, it became very apparent that the Kurdish informants did not talk in terms of economic outcomes as a result of demining. The data were then re-analyzed using a narrative framework and reported in this paper. Findings – While the research sought a link between demining, livelihoods, poverty reduction and economic development, the respondents told another story. Their story focused on the social consequences of returning to their “grandfather’s land”. Participants' narratives told of resilience resulting from negotiation with the environment and the importance of regaining one’s identity and hopes to heal in the face of adversity. Research limitations/implications – The findings cannot be generalized to all mine action program recipients but have salience for rural households in the site of inquiry. Originality/value – The paper is rare in illustrating the social benefits of post-conflict demining and its links with social capital and collective resilience.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | conflict; humanitarian assistance; internal displaced people; post-conflict reconstruction; resilience |
| Index terms: | narrative, program, methodology, thematic analysis, economic impact, interview, economic development, internal displaced people, social benefit, face, social capital, household, sampling, identity, land, purposive sampling, negotiation, post-conflict reconstruction, humanitarian, poverty |
| Subjects: | real estate economics, principle, psychology, data collection methods, financial analysis, sociology, conflict resolution, demography, methods and analysis, qualitative and interpretive research, post-disaster and reconstruction, research methods, software systems, theoretical framing, economic development |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Cost Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Ethics |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here