Duyne Barenstein, J E (2015) Continuity and change in housing and settlement patterns in post-earthquake Gujarat, India. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 6(2), pp. 140-155. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to examine people’s strategies to regain control over the socio-spatial organisation of their villages and transform their agency-built houses in culturally meaningful places post-disaster. In the aftermath of a disaster, building processes are often taken over by external agencies whose approach towards reconstruction is governed by considerations such as safety, efficiency, cost-effectiveness and – in some cases – also by an explicit will to trigger social transformations. As a result, reconstruction often entails dramatic changes in settlement location and morphologies, housing designs, building materials and construction processes. Design/methodology/approach – Based on an ongoing interdisciplinary empirical research project focusing on communities' patterns of adaptation to post-disaster relocated settlements in India, the paper examines people’s strategies to regain control over the socio-spatial organisation of their villages and to transform their agency-built houses in culturally meaningful places. Findings – The paper shows that people are not passive recipients of external agencies' often culturally insensitive project and that they have the capacity to transform externally imposed notions of appropriate housing to meet their cultural- and livelihood-specific needs. Based on a micro-level case study of a village in Gujarat, it is argued that underestimating communities' capacity to rebuild their own houses and villages and the failure to recognise the inherent functionality of local housing and building culture often entail not only missing the opportunity to enhance their resilience but also, in some cases, may lead to increasing their vulnerability. Originality/value – This paper presents a rare example of longitudinal research, calling attention to the long-term impacts of post-disaster reconstruction. It is of particular interest to scholars and humanitarian agencies concerned about the social consequences of relocation and reconstruction after natural disasters.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; case studies; community-centred; donor driven; post-disaster reconstruction; social impact |
| Index terms: | construction process, methodology, housing design, vulnerability, agency, building process, housing, community-centred, natural disaster, cost-effectivenes, strategy, functionality, relocation, earthquake, built environment, building material, post-disaster reconstruction, donor, India, social impact, reconstruction, efficiency, humanitarian, case study, adaptation, transformation |
| Subjects: | user focus, business, construction type, data collection methods, design features, principle, building materials, post-disaster and reconstruction, performance management, economics, research methods, management, design process, Geography, sociology, community engagement, building construction, market analysis, environmental hazards, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Ethics, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here