Mannakkara, S and Wilkinson, S (2015) Supporting post-disaster social recovery to build back better. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 6(2), pp. 126-139. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to propose a set of principles for implementation of successful post-disaster social recovery in-line with the concept of “building back better” (BBB). Design/methodology/approach – A set of preliminary principles for post-disaster social recovery was established from literature review. The 2009 Victorian Bushfires was chosen as a case study to examine the implemented social recovery approaches and impacts. Findings – Analysis of the literature and case study have led to the creation of a set of modified BBB principles for social recovery under two categories, first, community support and, second, community involvement. Key principles under first category include: providing personalized support for affected families, specialized support for vulnerable groups and improved psychological support; building community cohesion; and keeping the community informed. Key principles under second category include: involving the community in designing and implementing recovery projects; providing support to the community; and maintaining full transparency. Research limitations/implications – This study focusses on one case study. The appropriateness and applicability of the proposed principles can be further tested using a range of different case studies in both developed and developing countries. Practical implications – The principles presented should be incorporated into post-disaster social recovery programmes implemented by governments. Originality/value – This research takes a unique look at drawing from international experiences to form a set of practical and universal principles to aid post-disaster social recovery as an important part of BBB.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | build back better; participatory approaches; post-disaster reconstruction; social recovery; Victorian bushfires |
| Index terms: | implementation, transparency, community involvement, building community, post-disaster reconstruction, vulnerable group, recovery, case study, social recovery, methodology, literature review, cohesion, drawing, programme, developing country, bushfire, participatory approach |
| Subjects: | communities and social development, environmental hazards, project controls, professional development, development economics, structural engineering, research methods, post-disaster and reconstruction, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, operations management, technical documentation, community and social dimensions, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Time Control, Design Practice, Urban Studies, International Construction, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here