Strang, K D D (2015) Developing prescriptive environmental protection models from descriptive human accident behavior. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 6(4), pp. 438-453. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to examine human-made oil–gas disasters to illustrate how a prescriptive model could be developed. Resilience to human-made disasters, such as oil or gas spills, can be improved by using prescriptive models developed by analyzing past behavior. This type of study is useful for urban planning and monitoring, as there is a higher probability of human triggered disasters in densely populated areas. Design/methodology/approach – This study examined 10 years of more than 1,000 oil–gas disasters that were caused by humans in the upstate New York area to illustrate how a prescriptive model could be developed. Findings – A statistically significant predictive model was developed that indicated humans in certain industry categories were approximately six times more likely to have an oil–gas accident resulting in environmental pollution. Research limitations/implications – A prescriptive environmental protection model based on human accident behavior would generalize to all levels of government for policy planning, and it would be relevant to environmental protection groups in any region with a large population of humans using oil and gas (that covers most countries on earth). Originality/value – The empirical risk management literature was reviewed to identify factors related to environmental accident prediction with the goal of developing an explanatory model that would fit the oil–gas human accident data.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | disaster prevention; governance; manmade disasters; risk analysis; risk identification; social impact |
| Index terms: | methodology, population, urban planning, risk analysis, disaster prevention, environmental protection, New York, risk identification, risk management, monitoring, manmade disasters, social impact, oil and gas, pollution, governance |
| Subjects: | financial risk, Geography, research methods, environmental health, environmental hazards, environmental engineering, industry analysis, sociology, demography, control systems, business, risk assessment, urban planning |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Risk Management, Governance, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here