Zhang, J; Zou, W and Kumaraswamy, M (2015) Developing public private people partnership (4P) for post disaster infrastructure procurement. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 6(4), pp. 468-484. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose – The paper aims to integrate relevant “people” into public-private partnerships (PPP) to establish a public–private–people partnership (4P) approach that targets more sustainable and better value for money post-disaster infrastructure projects. This recognises “people” as major stakeholders apart from the public and private sectors. This paper also draws on a parallel study of relationship management (RM) to counteract problems arising from multiple participants and to synergise the public, private and “people” groupings. Design/methodology/approach – Semi-structured interviews, questionnaire surveys, a case study and a validation exercise through a focus group meeting were adopted to obtain empirical data and develop the 4P framework. Triangulation research strategy combining literature review, interviews and questionnaire survey were adopted in the parallel study of RM. Findings – It is concluded that 4P has great potential to achieve the targets of enhanced sustainability and value of money in post-disaster scenarios. In addition, “people” can provide the “missing link” in traditional PPP to further cement the partnership and achieve effective and integrated partnership between multiple participants. Originality/value – This paper adds a new dimension to PPP in proposing the integration of “people” into PPP to address prevalent gaps in identifying overall sustainable value. It also develops a practical 4P framework to guide practitioners who may wish to test it, to whatever extent possible. In parallel, it provides a methodological and theoretical foundation for such public, private and people partnerships in post-disaster infrastructure development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | infrastructure projects; post disaster reconstruction; public-private partnerships; public-private-people partnership; relationship management; value for money |
| Index terms: | infrastructure development, survey, literature review, strategy, focus group, interview, value-for-money, triangulation, practitioner, questionnaire, validation, methodology, integration, partnership, private sector, case study, exercise, dimension, infrastructure project, post-disaster reconstruction, relationship management |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, partnership management, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, post-disaster and reconstruction, research methods, management, evaluation, infrastructure engineering, professional development, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data analysis and analytics, research design and methodology, data collection methods, practitioner, health behaviours and lifestyles |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Human Resources, Value Management, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here