Burnside-Lawry, J and Carvalho, L (2016) A stakeholder approach to building community resilience: Awareness to implementation. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7(1), pp. 4-25. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: The paper aims to examine one local government’s efforts to increase local-level engagement in building community disaster resilience. Presenting the empirical evidence of stakeholder engagement activities that increase risk awareness and encourage collective action, the study addresses a key priority for the Post-2015 Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (Hyogo Framework for Action 2) to identify methods for increasing local-level implementation of disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative, case study approach is used to explore the case in depth. A review of literature from the multidisciplinary areas of communication, social and political theory frames data collection and analysis. Data collection includes observation, document analysis and interviews with policymakers, practitioners and local stakeholders to document achievements and lessons learnt from all perspectives. Findings: Preliminary results indicate that strong political leadership and inter-departmental coordination have contributed to engaging local-level participation in disaster risk reduction in the Municipality of Amadora, Portugal. Findings indicate that the implementation of a wide spectrum of public engagement initiatives has increased awareness of hazard risks amongst specific demographic groups and improved community and government capacity to identify and implement risk reduction strategies. Research limitations/implications: As this study is a work-in-progress and data analysis is in the early stages, interview transcripts included in this paper are limited to members of the team and their Director, Amadora Town Councillor for Civil Protection Services. Practical implications: It is commonly acknowledged that to date, achievements of the Hyogo Framework for Action 2010-2015 largely remain at the national level and have not reached local levels in a substantial manner. Addressing the need for more industry-led research to explore examples of successful stakeholder participation, the paper’s findings can be used by emergency management practitioners who recognise the need to merge climate change adaptation, risk reduction and local-level engagement to encourage public participation, inclusiveness and proactive planning. Originality/value: Co-authored by an Australian academic and a member of Amadora’s Campaign Team, the paper is a combination of empirical data from one city’s practical experience to develop and implement communication strategies in developing and implementing strategies to build community disaster resilience, analysed within a framework of communication, social and political theory.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communication; disaster risk reduction; risk management; stakeholders; sustainable development; united nations |
| Index terms: | practitioner, evidence, emergency management, methodology, collective action, disaster risk reduction, municipality, climate change, public participation, Hyogo framework, risk reduction, data analysis, local government, interview, sustainable development, strategy, disaster resilience, stakeholder engagement, risk management, building community, coordination, implementation, stakeholder participation, case study, adaptation, Portugal, United Nations, document analysis, public engagement |
| Subjects: | research methods, management, financial risk, Geography, health safety and environment, environmental hazards, communities and social development, administrative law, user focus, risk assessment, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, community and social dimensions, climate science, institutional frameworks, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, data science, participation process |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Governance, Procurement, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Legal Issues, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here