Horney, J; Simon, M C; Ricchetti-Masterson, K and Berke, P (2016) Resident perception of disaster recovery planning priorities. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7(4), pp. 330-343. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to determine household perceptions of disaster recovery plan development and implementation, and to identify groups that may be less aware of the recovery planning process to provide recommendations to officials for improving participation in planning and resident support of implementation priorities. Design/methodology/approach: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 194 residents of a US Atlantic coast county impacted by Hurricane Irene. Respondents were selected via a two-stage cluster sampling method automated through the use of a Geographic Information Systems toolkit. Findings: Although few households reported participation in the county’s recovery planning process, a majority felt that the plan would be better if it incorporated input from a wide range of stakeholders. The number one reason residents did not participate was the lack of knowledge that they could. Some vulnerable populations were less aware of the recovery plan, including the elderly and those living in poverty, while others were more aware, including those with children and those without access to a working vehicle. Respondents prioritized recovery activities around infrastructure and public safety, yet ranked activities related to public information and housing as less important. Practical implications: This paper highlights potential successes of emergency management outreach and identifies groups that are not being reached during recovery planning. The paper provides insight on resident priorities for recovery after disaster. Originality/value: There has been little research on the implementation of recovery plans and few studies that have examined the behaviors and opinions of households with regard to recovery plan development and implementation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case studies; community-centred; disaster response; extreme weather events; natural disasters; post disaster reconstruction |
| Index terms: | natural disaster, community-centred, interview, public safety, face, disaster recovery, methodology, population, emergency management, toolkit, housing, elderly, recovery, planning process, case study, disaster response, disaster recovery planning, poverty, children, household, sampling, post-disaster reconstruction, extreme weather event, implementation, geographic information system |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, demography, geographical techniques and analysis, project controls, community engagement, emergency and crisis management, sociology, financial risk, research methods, software systems, post-disaster and reconstruction, contractual arrangements, psychology, operations management, climate science, data collection methods, construction type |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Ethics |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here