Kuittinen, M (2016) Does the use of recycled concrete lower the carbon footprint in humanitarian construction? International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7(5), pp. 472-488. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigates the carbon footprint of the alternative structure types and materials used for the reconstruction of schools in Haiti. Are recycled construction materials more environmental than virgin materials? To estimate which alternative construction solution has the smallest carbon footprint, a survey was made for the school model used for the reconstruction programme in Haiti after the 2010 earthquake. Design/methodology/approach: The carbon footprint was calculated using life cycle assessment methodology for five different concrete structure alternatives and five different cement mixes for the same design of a school building. In addition, the uptake of CO2 through the carbonation of concrete during 50 years was calculated. Findings: The carbon footprint of recycled materials can be either the best or worst option, depending on how the materials are used. The difference to using virgin materials is not big. This is mainly due to the lower structural performance of recycled materials, which needs to be compensated for by using additional reinforcements. Using cement mixes that have high amounts of substitutes for cement seems to lower the carbon footprint of structures considerably. The uptake of CO2 in carbonation has potential but requires an optimal design and environment. Originality/value: The findings give information for humanitarian project managers and designers on lowering the carbon footprint of their construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; case studies; climate change; construction materials; post disaster reconstruction; sustainable construction |
| Index terms: | case study, project manager, humanitarian, carbonation, carbon footprint, reconstruction, designer, post-disaster reconstruction, built environment, construction material, earthquake, reinforcement, concrete structure, option, recycled materials, estimate, sustainable construction, programme, survey, life cycle assessment, Haiti, construction project, school building, methodology, climate change |
| Subjects: | production management, health safety and environment, Geography, sustainable construction, structural engineering, research methods, post-disaster and reconstruction, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental hazards, project controls, building construction, decision analysis, environmental impact, materials science, climate science, data collection methods, construction type, profession, financial and cost management, building materials, principle |
| Topics: | Time Control, Ethics, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here