Interaction analysis during management and design team meetings

Gorse, C A; Emmitt, S; Lowis, M and Howarth, A (2000) Interaction analysis during management and design team meetings. In: Akintoye, A (ed.) Proceedings of 16th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2000, Glasgow, UK.

Abstract

Nottingham University, UKManagement and design team meetings provide a central forum for requesting and exchanging information necessary to ensure the successful and timely completion of the construction project. Whilst such meetings are common to the vast majority of construction projects, little is known about the professional involvement and interaction during the meetings. By observing and quantifying interactions using the Bales (1951) Interaction Process Analysis (IPA) Technique important insights have be made. The Bales IPA provides a system for observing, analysing and interpreting social interaction in small face-to-face groups. The method is used to identify who is interacting and classify the interaction (statements) into either one of six socio-emotional categories or one of six task related categories. The paper presents the findings of an ongoing research project that involves, inter alia, four case studies where data on the interaction of management and design teams were collected during site meetings. The results show interaction patterns, the frequency of the participants' active contribution, and the professionals attending the meetings. Using qualitative and quantitative analysis the issue of control, power and leadership are discussed.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: communication; interaction analysis; management; design
Index terms: construction project, process analysis, social interaction, quantitative analysis, interaction, case study, design team, face
Subjects: management, production management, sociology, behavioral psychology, data collection methods, psychology, professional practice, data analysis and analytics
Topics: Organizational Design, Design Practice, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here