Kuittinen, M and Takano, A (2017) The energy efficiency and carbon footprint of temporary homes: A case study from Japan. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 8(4), pp. 326-343. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the energy efficiency and life cycle carbon footprint of temporary homes in Japan after the Great Eastern Tohoku Earthquake in 2011. Design/methodology/approach: An energy simulation and life cycle assessment have been done for three alternative shelter models: prefabricated shelters, wooden log shelters and sea container shelters. Findings: Shelter materials have a very high share of life cycle emissions because the use period of temporary homes is short. Wooden shelters perform best in the comparison. The clustering of shelters into longer buildings or on top of each other increases their energy efficiency considerably. Sea containers piled on top of each other have superb energy performance compared to other models, and they consume even less energy per household than the national average. However, there are several gaps of knowledge in the environmental assessment of temporary homes and field data from refugee camps should be collected as part of camp management. Originality/value: The findings exemplify the impacts of the proper design of temporary homes for mitigating their energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon footprint; climate change; energy; great eastern Tohoku earthquake; Japan; life cycle assessment; shelter |
| Index terms: | clustering, energy performance, household, great eastern Tohoku earthquake, refugee, life cycle, energy efficiency, carbon footprint, energy demand, case study, environmental assessment, climate change, greenhouse gas emission, methodology, life cycle assessment, Japan, energy simulation |
| Subjects: | environmental health, environmental hazards, demography, Geography, research methods, data science, energy systems, modelling and simulation, sustainability and energy, climate science, value management, environmental impact, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here