Planning for the redevelopment after a fire event

MacKenzie, A (2017) Planning for the redevelopment after a fire event. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 8(4), pp. 344-356. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of planners and designers in supporting residents to negotiate the challenges of rebuilding after wildfire on the urban fringe. The research seeks to understand how planning and design professionals, in providing professional services, comprehend the changing expectations of residents transitioning from emergency to the slow process of achieving a post fire normal state through the project of redesigning their homes. Design/methodology/approach: This paper uses semi-structured interviews to examine the role of planners and designers employed to facilitate and assess, or provide design services for residents who rebuilt houses after the 2003 bushfires in Canberra, Australia’s Capital City. Narrative analysis was used to identify emerging themes based on their professional experiences during the redevelopment of the suburb. Findings: Case analysis shows that external influences were significant contributing factors in determining the design of houses rebuilt after the fires. The goal for both the designers and residents was to design a more sustainable built form; however, this was not achieved as external social and cultural influences came into the decision-making process. Practical implications: The paper provides a different perspective on the competing goals planners and designers face in supporting residents to rebuild after disasters such as wild fires. It highlights the changing nature of the relationship between professionals and community. In particular, the research suggests planners can play an important role as observers and facilitators of long-term change occurring in the years after wildfire. The research provides insights into how planners and building designers may better serve the community by gaining a better understanding of the changing nature of redevelopment over time. Originality/value: The research provides a novel approach to understanding the challenges facing planners and building designers working with residents to rebuild houses after wildfire. The paper makes the case for a better understanding of the temporal dynamics and external influences affecting decision making in post disaster redevelopment of homes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architecture; fire; planning; recovery; redevelopment; sustainable development
Index terms: recovery, designer, Australia, facilitator, decision-making process, planner, dynamics, bushfire, interview, rebuilding, sustainable development, face, methodology, professional service, decision-making, narrative, redevelopment, built form
Subjects: organization, profession, data collection methods, practitioner, operations management, psychology, urban form and morphology, research methods, health safety and environment, Geography, qualitative and interpretive research, decision analysis, building construction, systems engineering, environmental hazards, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here