Pongiglione, M; Calderini, C and Guy, G B (2017) A new demountable seismic-resistant joint to improve industrial building reparability. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 8(3), pp. 251-262. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: In seismic-prone areas, post-event operability is an important issue for steel warehouses. Even if surviving earthquakes with minimal probability of collapse, these structures might suffer so much damage, that their repair costs would be prohibitive. Strategies for limiting the building's damaged zones to specific parts (or “fuses”) can reduce repair costs. However, the replaceable part is limited to a small portion of the structure, whereas the rest cannot be disassembled. This is an issue for structures whose life span depends more likely on economics rather than on structural performances. Therefore, making them easily disassembled would be an advantage not only in seismic areas but also in any industrialized area. The purpose of this paper is to explore the “Design for Disassembly” (DfD) approach to complement seismic design and find a compromise between them. Design/methodology/approach: In this work, one single type of structures was analysed (the moment-resisting frame), focusing on the design of a “disassemblable” seismic-resistant steel connection. The design process involved several iterations until an “optimum” compromise between seismic design and DfD was met. Findings: This study shows that a compromise between seismic design and DfD is possible. In this case, the compromise was achieved at the expenses of more complex design calculations and a greater number of components than standard connections. However, this would be compensated for by a higher residual value for the entire structure. Originality/value: Eventually, it was proved that a metric for assessing DfD steel connections is possible, but structural analyses are needed to validate it.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design for disassembly; design for repair; resilience; reuse; steel structures' sustainability; sustainable construction |
| Index terms: | earthquake, design for disassembly, steel structure, structural analysis, seismic design, sustainable construction, design process, strategy, methodology, repair, design for repair |
| Subjects: | sustainable construction, structural engineering, management, research methods, maintenance engineering, specialized materials and systems, environmental hazards, design methods, sustainability and energy |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here