Su, Y S (2017) Rebuild, retreat or resilience: Urban flood vulnerability analysis and simulation in Taipei. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 8(2), pp. 110-122. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to propose the practice of urban resilience to flooding in a vulnerable Asian city, Taipei. It conducts Geographic Information System (GIS)-based simulations to assess Taipei’s vulnerability under a set of varying flooding scenarios and likelihoods. This research concludes by proposing remedies to fill the gaps these flood simulations reveal and, in doing so, promotes urban resilience in Taipei. This paper provides an example of urban resilience to flooding for other cities in Asia. Design/methodology/approach: The paper undertakes a case study of Taipei to survey current practices and historic analyses as a tool to evaluate a chronology of policies implemented to make Taipei resilient to flooding. It also conducts flood simulation and scenario analysis through the technology of GIS by using ArcMap 10.2.2 software to gauge the vulnerabilities in Taipei. These GIS-based data sets are collected from Taiwan’s central and local governments. This paper analyzes the vulnerability of population, land value, residential properties, GDP and critical facilities, such as major subway stations, medical centers, public schools, major public buildings, electric power substations and gas/oil stations. Additionally, it analyzes the likelihood and cost and benefit of different flooding scenarios based on typhoon and rainfall data sets in 1975-2014 period. After a thorough analysis of vulnerability, likelihood of flooding and cost–benefit analyses, this research develops Taipei resilience policies to address the vulnerabilities. Findings: The findings indicate that Taipei case study, a chronology of policies implemented to prevent flooding, explains that costly engineering structures, rebuilding and fortification against floods eventually created a false sense of security, which has encouraged more intensive residential and commercial developments in flood-prone areas, and led to a higher level of vulnerability. Additionally, flooding simulations indicate that 40 per cent of Taipei City is located in flood risk areas in an extreme weather scenario. This percentage is higher than other global cities such as London’s 15 per cent, Tokyo’s 10 per cent and New York City’s 25 per cent. Based on the 10 per cent of total flooding areas above 0.5 m, the vulnerable population is estimated at 200,000 people, or 7 per cent of the total population. The GDP impact will be more than $28bn. More than $67bn of land value is vulnerable. A least one million subway passengers will be affected each day. Further, there is little evidence that the urban poor are particularly vulnerable to floods. On the contrary, some neighborhoods with high-income households face a higher risk of floods. Very few medical centers, oil and gas stations and electrical power substations are located in flood-prone areas, but a large number of public schools, administrative buildings and major subway stations are susceptible. Additionally, the likelihood analysis of flooding in an extreme rainfall scenario concludes that the possibility will be five times that of the existing assumption with a flood in every 200 years. Thus, Taipei City’s infrequent once-in-two-century floods are likely to occur more frequently. Originality/value: This paper provides a thorough analysis of vulnerability, likelihood of flooding and cost–benefit analyses in Taipei. It also develops Taipei resilience policies to address the vulnerabilities. In the future, rather than strengthening and rebuilding costly structures, Taipei should focus on land-use and environmental planning for resilience. Urban policies should include environmentally responsible development in the face of continued population and economic growth, and being resilient regarding natural disasters. Most important is the need for a strong political commitment and leadership to initiate and implement urban policies toward resilience.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Asian resilient city; environmental resilience; flood vulnerability analysis; risk identification; urban flood simulation; urban resilience |
| Index terms: | residential property, case study, urban flood simulation, resilient city, flood vulnerability analysis, public school, commercial development, economic growth, substation, land, oil and gas, geographic information system, scenario analysis, electric power, London, household, income, New York, survey, risk identification, rebuilding, commitment, flooding, urban policy, face, local government, environmental resilience, Tokyo, Taiwan, natural disaster, chronology, rainfall, public building, weather, urban poor, urban resilience, vulnerability, strengthening, evidence, Asia, methodology, population |
| Subjects: | psychology, urban planning, environmental management and studies, sustainability and resilience, real estate economics, energy systems, economic analysis, regions and continents, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, construction type, policy studies, air quality, community and social dimensions, climate science, demography, geographical techniques and analysis, building construction, educational institutions, administrative law, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental hazards, time analysis, economic development, structural engineering, research methods, Geography, financial risk |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Time Control, Education, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Governance, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here