Chowdhooree, I and Islam, I (2018) Factors and actors for enhancing community flood resilience: An experience from a river-side settlement in Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(2), pp. 153-169. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: Enhancing community flood resilience is a critical aspect of flood risk management that requires a systematic process of capacity building through incorporating mitigation measures. The inhabitants of South Rishipara, a riverside settlement of Bangladesh, are accommodating themselves in a flood-prone location through modifying their built environment. The purpose of this study is to conduct a detailed investigation regarding the built environment development and find out roles of different actors and contributing factors for enhancing community flood resilience. Design/methodology/approach: This case study-based post-positivist research uses multiple lines of inquiries, which include focus group discussions, transect walks, in-depth semi-structured interviews, pair-wise comparisons and a questionnaire survey, mostly in a participatory appraisal manner to obtain data about community experiences and perceptions. Findings: About 66.7 per cent of respondents identified themselves as severely affected by flood before the recent development with increased elevation of land, flood protection walls, reclaimed land from the river, underground drainage system, a new layout of plots and houses of better quality. In the post-development situation, not a single respondent identified him/ her in that condition. “Coordination and cooperation among GOs, NGOs and donor agency” (GO: governmental organization; NGO: nongovernmental organization) and “awareness about the flood vulnerability” were identified as key factors and the NGO was identified as the key actor for enhancing community flood resilience by the survey participants. Originality/value: This research, through exploring the nuanced relationship between built environment development and community resilience, will contribute to address uncertainties associated with community capacities to respond to risks.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; capacity; disaster mitigation; flooding; NGO; resilience |
| Index terms: | case study, community resilience, capacity building, Bangladesh, built environment, investigation, disaster mitigation, donor, land, coordination, interview, focus group, flooding, flood risk management, survey, methodology, mitigation, questionnaire, vulnerability, cooperation, appraisal, agency, drainage |
| Subjects: | real estate economics, psychology, social and economic development, data collection methods, environmental hazards, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, financial risk, social equity, Geography, research methods, factor and component analysis, management |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here