Flyen, C; Hauge, Å L; Almås, A J and Godbolt, Å L (2018) Municipal collaborative planning boosting climate resilience in the built environment. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(1), pp. 58-69. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: A meta-study covering the past decade maps the development of Norwegian municipal planning, climate adaptation and institutional vulnerability towards climate change. This paper aims to explore the implementation of climate adaptive changes in Norwegian legal planning and building framework into municipal practice and policy instruments from 2007 to 2016. The study is planned to answer the question: what drivers ensure increased municipal efforts in their climate adaptive planning and building practice? Design/methodology/approach: The paper presents empirical findings from two qualitative research projects, each with nine interviews of municipal key personnel within three municipalities' planning and building services and an ongoing qualitative, expert interview-based study (eight individual/group interviews). Findings: Risk reduction and climate resilience are still unsatisfactorily attended in many Norwegian municipalities. There is a gap between political and administrative levels in communicating bilateral expectations and needs for incorporation of climate adaptive measures. Policy instruments maintaining climate adaptation are in demand by different building process actors. Yet, extreme weather events seem to be the main drivers for actual implementation of climate change aspects into municipal policy instruments. Networking, both within and between municipalities, is an important strategy for learning climate adaptation. Research limitations/implications: Both globally and in Norway, the focus on climate change impacts is steadily increasing. Municipal risk and vulnerability analyses are statutory, as is the incorporation of the results into local plans at appropriate levels. Originality/value: The originality of this paper is the meta-perspective over the past decade, the qualitative approach and the use of environmental psychology theories.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; climate adaptation; climate change; law and regulatory frameworks; local planning; resilience |
| Index terms: | collaborative planning, interview, personnel, maps, local planning, risk reduction, networking, strategy, Norway, municipal planning, qualitative research, methodology, climate adaptation, vulnerability, building process, psychology, climate change, municipality, policy instrument, building practice, building service, climate resilience, qualitative approach, built environment, extreme weather event, implementation |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, administrative law, environmental hazards, behavioral psychology, building construction, Geography, urban design, financial risk, management, research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, contractual arrangements, urban planning, communication, engineering systems, climate science, data collection methods, research design and methodology, policy studies |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Procurement, Sustainability, Governance, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Site Management, Human Resources, Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here